Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.

By JM Talboo and Steve W. people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth debunkers.


The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States”
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 

We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]

So it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.

Unsurprisingly, the duh-bunkturds hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth "debunkers" and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public. This site now features 9/11 truth related and not-so-related content. So please utilize our search feature (found also on the sidebar) to find a massive treasure trove of well-researched info on nearly every issue in the realm of 9/11 truth debate. 

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.


National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Saturday, February 17, 2018

4chan trolled the ADL and the mainstream media into believing that school shooter Nikolas Cruz was part of the Republic of Florida militia. - Another Mass Shooting and Again this Certain Thing Will Be Ignored [Anti-Depressants]

Editor's Note: The reports mentioned in the first video here that Cruz was a registered Democrat are incorrect. I'm siding with the oft-debunked debunkers over at Snopes... on this one.

Another Mass Shooting and Again this Certain Thing Will Be Ignored [Anti-Depressants]

In the 1980s we had all the same guns as today and yet the first and only school shooting was in 1989 and it was by an adult not a student, which resulted in the Roberti-Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989. From 1990 to 1999 there were 24 mass shootings with 5 School Shootings. Fat forward, in just the past 7years and two months there have been 44 mass shootings



[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 18th, 2018.]

4chan trolled the ADL and the mainstream media into believing that school shooter Nikolas Cruz was part of the Republic of Florida militia. - Another Mass Shooting and Again this Certain Thing Will Be Ignored [Anti-Depressants] 


The Politics of Nikolas Cruz Shooter and Gun Free Cuck Zones - The Truth About The Florida School Shooting and Nikolas Cruz:

A Boy Can Dream...

A Boy Can Dream!

Friday, February 16, 2018

The Truth About the Black Panther Movie - We Wuz Everybody - Wakanda Now - Why Black Panther's Alt Right & Wakanda's an Ethnostate

Why Black Panther's Alt Right & Wakanda's an Ethnostate:

The Truth About the Black Panther Movie - We Wuz Everybody - Wakanda Now - Why Black Panther's Alt Right & Wakanda's an Ethnostate


Styxhexenhammer666 Explains Why the Alt-Right is Wrong about Ethno-Nationalism: 

The Solution to Rotten Tomatoes Gibs Me Dat 100% Black Panthers #Blaxit:

White People CAN’T WATCH Black Panther?? | Ben Shapiro REACTS to SJW Tweet - Can white kids wear a Black Panther Mask? Uncle Hotep chimes: 

3 reasons Black Panther is the best movie ever! Rotten Tomatoes is fighting back against trolls giving Back Panther a low rating. - Black Panther Actor Faces Backlash for Not Dating Black Women - SJW Marvel's BLACK PANTHER Joins A "Woke" Team of Super-Racists - Black Panther is NOT Diverse but that's Okay: 


Original article by Gwynne Watkins. "
"'Star Wars' needs a woman director, not the 'Game of Thrones' guys" 

Spookyweather comment: Rather than develop good stories the SJWs planned ways of making the Star Wars films more ethnically/racially diverse. This is a symptom of misguided hatred directed against white people. The SJWs misunderstand how the Hollywood films came about in a historical sense. The people working in Hollywood were mostly white at the time. You would expect them to make films involving people from this group, just as the Chinese or Indians make films featuring people drawn from those around them. Are Indian or Chinese filmmakers unconsciously racist for not making ethnically diverse films (even today?).

And how about all the ethnically unique regions around the world, like Tibet or Japan, or small Island Nations? If we follow the SJW logic one would want to make all these places more ethnically diverse, or would refusal to do so be called racist? Often we here about trying to preserve non-white cultures from being 'overrun' and yet the same is never true when the boot is on the other foot. White people are allegedly the devil - but only when you ignore human history in which Blacks, Arabs and Asians all engaged in acts of cruelty, slavery and cultural domination that lasted many hundreds of years.

The SJW nonsense has to stop. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 17th, 2018.]